Login

Criminal Procedure Reform for Strengthening Human Rights Protection in Indonesian Pretrial Proceedings

Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System:

Bambang Sasmita Adi Putra (1), Sigid Lesmonojati (2), Jawade Hafidz (3), Hasudungan Parlindungan Sidauruk (4), Ibrahim Kaya (5)

(1) Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung, Semarang, Indonesia
(2) Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung, Semarang, Indonesia
(3) Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung, Semarang, Indonesia
(4) Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung, Semarang, Indonesia
(5) Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
Fulltext View | Download

Abstract:

Pretrial review is an essential mechanism for judicial oversight and human rights protection in criminal proceedings. However, its limited scope and the unclear distinction between procedural and substantive issues create uncertainty regarding whether the expiry of prosecution limitation periods can be challenged through pretrial review. This issue remains insufficiently explored, particularly concerning the relationship between prosecutorial authority, judicial review, and human rights protection. This study aims to examine the limitations of pretrial review in Indonesia, identify relevant lessons from the United States, and propose a rights-based reconstruction of pretrial review concerning time-barred prosecutions. It employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, with qualitative analysis of relevant legal materials. The findings reveal three key points. First, Indonesian law does not explicitly establish expired prosecution limitation periods as a separate object of pretrial review, creating uncertainty regarding the legal basis and procedures for challenging prosecutorial authority. Second, the United States demonstrates how mechanisms such as preliminary hearings, pretrial motions, and habeas corpus provide avenues for judicial scrutiny, although their functions and limitations differ from Indonesian pretrial review. Third, Indonesia requires a clearer framework for reviewing limitation-related objections based on legality, effective human rights protection, and judicial restraint. Such reform should clarify jurisdiction, examination standards, and legal consequences without extending pretrial review into the determination of criminal liability.

References

Anderson, Claudia N., Joshua C. Cochran, and Andrea N. Montes, ‘How Punitive Is Pretrial? Measuring the Relative Pains of Pretrial Detention’, Punishment & Society, 26.5 (2024), 790–812 https://doi.org/10.1177/14624745231218702

Bowman, Rachel, Daniela Oramas Mora, Ojmarrh Mitchell, and Cassia Spohn, ‘Gender in the Courtroom Workgroup: Understanding the Relationship Between the Composition of Workgroups and the Gender Gap in Punishment’, Criminal Justice and Behavior, 50.3 (2023), 410–28 https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548221140362

van den Brink, Yannick, ‘Different but Equal? Exploring Potential Catalysts of Disparity in Remand Decision-Making in the Youth Court’, Social & Legal Studies, 31.3 (2022), 477–500 https://doi.org/10.1177/09646639211033709

———, ‘Remand Decision-Making in the Youth Court. A Comparative Analysis of Youth Remand and Bail in England & Wales and the Netherlands’, International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 66 (2021), 100487 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2021.100487

———, ‘Young, Accused and Detained; Awful, But Lawful? Pre-Trial Detention and Children’s Rights Protection in Contemporary Western Societies’, Youth Justice, 19.3 (2019), 238–61 https://doi.org/10.1177/1473225419884658

Cadoff, Becca, Kevin T. Wolff, and Preeti Chauhan, ‘Exploring Variation in Factors Associated with Increased Likelihood of Pretrial Detention’, Journal of Criminal Justice, 74 (2021), 101799 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2021.101799

Campbell, Christopher M., Ryan M. Labrecque, Michael Weinerman, and Ken Sanchagrin, ‘Gauging Detention Dosage: Assessing the Impact of Pretrial Detention on Sentencing Outcomes Using Propensity Score Modeling’, Journal of Criminal Justice, 70 (2020), 101719 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2020.101719

Carroll, Jenny E., ‘The Ever-Shifting Ground of Pretrial Detention Reform’, Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 19.1 (2023), 75–91 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-120122-092655

Chen, Elsa Y., Emily Chung, and Emily Sands, ‘Courtroom Workgroup Dynamics and Implementation of Three Strikes Reform’, Law & Policy, 46.2 (2024), 112–39 https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12233

Copp, Jennifer E., ‘Cash Bail and Pretrial Compliance: Evidence from a Court‐imposed Policy Shock’, Criminology & Public Policy, 24.4 (2025), 601–22 https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.70002

Dhami, Mandeep K., and Yannick N. van den Brink, ‘A Multi-Disciplinary and Comparative Approach to Evaluating Pre-Trial Detention Decisions: Towards Evidence-Based Reform’, European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 28.3 (2022), 381–95 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-022-09510-0

van Dijck, Gijs, ‘Predicting Recidivism Risk Meets AI Act’, European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 28.3 (2022), 407–23 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-022-09516-8

Dobbie, Will, and Crystal S. Yang, ‘The US Pretrial System: Balancing Individual Rights and Public Interests’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 35.4 (2021), 49–70 https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.35.4.49

Fazel, Seena, Amir Sariaslan, and Thomas Fanshawe, ‘Towards a More Evidence-Based Risk Assessment for People in the Criminal Justice System: The Case of OxRec in the Netherlands’, European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 28.3 (2022), 397–406 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-022-09520-y

Foudray, Chelsea M. A., and Evan M. Lowder, ‘Judicial Decision-Making in the Era of Pretrial Reform’, Psychology, Crime & Law, 32.2 (2026), 451–78 https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2024.2375225

Griffin, Beth Ann, Megan S. Schuler, Matt Cefalu, Lynsay Ayer, Mark Godley, Noah Greifer, and others, ‘A Tutorial for Propensity Score Weighting for Moderation Analysis With Categorical Variables’, Medical Care, 61.12 (2023), 836–45 https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000001922

Ilyas, Adam, Fachrizal Afandi, and Indah Dwi Qurbani, ‘Closing the Injustice Gap: Reconstructing Pre-Trial Proceedings as an Effective Remedy for Victims of Terminated Preliminary Inquiries’, Jurnal Konstitusi, 22.4 (2025), 736–76 https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2247

Kim, Jung K., and Yumi Koh, ‘Pretrial Justice Reform and Black–White Difference in Employment’, Applied Economics, 54.12 (2022), 1396–1414 https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2021.1976387

Knes, Anna S., Evan M. Lowder, Mindy L. Thai, Sydney M. Reuter, and Autumn R. Kent, ‘Multi‐study Examination of Criminal‐legal Professionals’ Use of Risk Assessments in Pretrial Decision‐making’, Legal and Criminological Psychology, 30.2 (2025), 268–97 https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12305

Koppel, Stephen, Tiffany Bergin, René Ropac, Imani Randolph, and Hannah Joseph, ‘Examining the Causal Effect of Pretrial Detention on Case Outcomes: A Judge Fixed Effect Instrumental Variable Approach’, Journal of Experimental Criminology, 20.2 (2024), 439–56 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-022-09542-w

Kusuma, Bagus Hendradi, Barda Nawawi Arief, Pujiyono Pujiyono, Ridwan Arifin, and Izan Mateo Cassandro, ‘Reforming the Statute of Limitations under Indonesia’s New Criminal Code: Toward a Modern Criminal Justice System’, Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 7.2 (2026), 951–86 https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v7i2.42768

Lacoe, Johanna, Brett Fischer, and Steven Raphael, ‘The Effect of a Pre-Arraignment Legal Representation Pilot on Pretrial Release and Criminal Case Outcomes’, Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 41.2 (2025), 269–91 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-024-09596-1

Lacoe, Johanna, Alissa Skog, and Mia Bird, ‘Bail Reform and Pretrial Release: Examining the Implementation of In Re Humphrey’, Criminology & Public Policy, 24.1 (2025), 123–48 https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12688

Lattimore, Pamela K., Cassia Spohn, and Matthew Demichele, ‘Reimagining Pretrial & Sentencing’, Contexts, 20.4 (2021), 14–21 https://doi.org/10.1177/15365042211058120

Lerman, Amy E., Ariel Lewis Green, and Patricio Dominguez, ‘Pleading for Justice: Bullpen Therapy, Pre-Trial Detention, and Plea Bargains in American Courts’, Crime & Delinquency, 68.2 (2022), 159–82 https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128721999339

Light, Michael T, and Hilde Wermink, ‘The Criminal Case Processing of Foreign Nationals in the Netherlands’, European Sociological Review, 37.1 (2021), 104–20 https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcaa039

St. Louis, Stacie, ‘Bail Denied or Bail Too High? Disentangling Cumulative Disadvantage by Pretrial Detention Type’, Journal of Criminal Justice, 82 (2022), 101971 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2022.101971

St. Louis, Stacie, Marlena G. Bolton, and Nick Petersen, ‘Is There a (Pre)Trial Penalty? Assessing the Joint Impacts of Pretrial Detention and Trial Conviction on Sentencing’, Crime & Delinquency, 71.11 (2025), 3419–51 https://doi.org/10.1177/00111287251318984

Martufi, Adriano, ‘Pre-Trial Detention and EU Law: Constitutional Constraints, Legislative Reluctance and Non-Binding Norms’, New Journal of European Criminal Law, 17.1 (2026), 78–100 https://doi.org/10.1177/20322844251410848

Martufi, Adriano, and Christina Peristeridou, ‘The Purposes of Pre-Trial Detention and the Quest for Alternatives’, European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 28.2 (2020), 153–74 https://doi.org/10.1163/15718174-bja10002

———, ‘Towards an Evidence-Based Approach to Pre-Trial Detention in Europe’, European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 28.3 (2022), 357–65 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-022-09526-6

Mitchell, Ojmarrh, Daniela Oramas Mora, Tracey L. Sticco, and Lyndsay N. Boggess, ‘Are Progressive Chief Prosecutors Effective in Reducing Prison Use and Cumulative Racial/Ethnic Disadvantage? Evidence from Florida’, Criminology & Public Policy, 21.3 (2022), 535–65 https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12598

Mooney, Jayne, and Jarrod Shanahan, ‘Rikers Island: The Failure of a “Model” Penitentiary’, The Prison Journal, 100.6 (2020), 687–708 https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885520968238

Morgan, Lauren A., Faraneh Shamserad, and Beth M. Huebner, ‘Right to Counsel? A Mixed‐methods Evaluation of the St. Louis County Initial Appearance Program’, Criminology & Public Policy, 23.2 (2024), 431–57 https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12660

Oleksy, Kacper, ‘The Statute of Limitations in 21st Century: Between Public and Individual Interests in the Criminal Justice System’, Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal, 11.3 (2025) https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v11i3.1199

Omori, Marisa, and Nick Petersen, ‘Institutionalizing Inequality in the Courts: Decomposing Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Detention, Conviction, and Sentencing*’, Criminology, 58.4 (2020), 678–713 https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12257

Oramas Mora, Daniela, Ojmarrh Mitchell, and Cassia Spohn, ‘Does Variation across Judicial Circuits Matter? Examining the Role of Bail Schedules and Pretrial Detention on Drug Case Outcomes in Florida’, Journal of Criminal Justice, 99 (2025), 102464 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102464

Page, Joshua, and Christine S. Scott-Hayward, ‘Bail and Pretrial Justice in the United States: A a of Possibility’, Annual Review of Criminology, 5.1 (2022), 91–113 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-030920-093024

Rogan, Mary, ‘Examining the Role of Legal Culture as a Protective Factor Against High Rates of Pre-Trial Detention: The Case of Ireland’, European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 28.3 (2022), 425–33 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-022-09515-9

Smith, Tom, ‘The Practice of Pre-Trial Detention in England & Wales - Changing Law and Changing Culture’, European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 28.3 (2022), 435–49 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-022-09504-y

SMITH, TOM, ‘“Rushing Remand”? Pretrial Detention and Bail Decision Making in England and Wales’, The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice, 60.1 (2021), 46–74 https://doi.org/10.1111/hojo.12392

Sukmayanti, Made Sinthia, and AAA. Ngurah Tini Rusmini Gorda, ‘Implementation of Substantive Justice in Juvenile Serious Crime Cases in Indonesia’, Journal of Sustainable Development and Regulatory Issues (JSDERI), 4.2 (2026), 715–44 https://doi.org/10.53955/jsderi.v4i2.372

Susilo, Erwin, Mohd Din, Suhaimi, and Teuku Muttaqin Mansur, ‘Access to Justice’, Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 14.2 (2025), 317–50 https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.14.2.2025.317-350

Thai, Mindy L., and Evan M. Lowder, ‘Spotlighting Pretrial Reform: Media Effects on Perceptions of Bail Reform and Pretrial Risk Assessments’, American Journal of Criminal Justice, 51.5 (2026), 1331–55 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-025-09882-z

Thomas, Christopher, Becca Cadoff, Kevin T. Wolff, and Preeti Chauhan, ‘How Do the Consequences of Pretrial Detention on Guilty Pleas and Carceral Sentences Vary between Misdemeanor and Felony Cases?’, Journal of Criminal Justice, 82 (2022), 102008 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2022.102008

Tralmaka, Ilze, ‘Upholding Fundamental Rights in National Arrest Warrant Proceedings in Practice: A Need for Third Level of Judicial Protection?’, European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 28.3 (2022), 451–64 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-022-09518-6

Wermink, Hilde, Michael T. Light, and Alicja P. Krubnik, ‘Pretrial Detention and Incarceration Decisions for Foreign Nationals: A Mixed-Methods Approach’, European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 28.3 (2022), 367–80 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-022-09519-5

Wieczorek, Irene, ‘EU Harmonisation of Norms Regulating Detention: Is EU Competence (Art. 82(2)b TFEU) Fit for Purpose?’, European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 28.3 (2022), 465–81 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-022-09521-x